From f960d4f486aa71f4c8e11ae3c464df1bbb84ed4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:55:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] inspector: Annotate a call whose return value we don't need

The way this code is written, we know that there is an item in
the hash table and the iter_next call will give it to us, so
no need to check the return value. Annotate the call to tell
coverity.
---
 gtk/inspector/gestures.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gtk/inspector/gestures.c b/gtk/inspector/gestures.c
index e62d408b2f..b6e87d9f0b 100644
--- a/gtk/inspector/gestures.c
+++ b/gtk/inspector/gestures.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ gtk_inspector_gestures_set_object (GtkInspectorGestures *sl,
       gpointer key, value;
       GtkGesture *gesture;
       g_hash_table_iter_init (&iter, hash);
-      g_hash_table_iter_next (&iter, &key, &value);
+      (void)g_hash_table_iter_next (&iter, &key, &value);
       gesture = key;
       add_gesture_group (sl, object, gesture, hash);
     }