The code that was trying to limit preview size changes was
running into some width-for-height pitfalls. It turns out
that the dialog behaves quite ok without this code, so just
remove it.
The recently-used.xbel storage for recently used files is located inside
the $XDG_DATA_HOME directory; there's no actual guarantee that the
directory has been created already, even though it's very highly
probable on any modern distribution. We should create it, along with its
intermediate parents, before constructing the file monitor that we use
to get change notifications.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671817https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667808
The builder XML description has an action for "win.parse" but the
application is looking for "win.paste". Rename the label to
"_Paste" and the action to "win.paste" in the window action XML.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678829
nitems is never guaranteed to be defined in sys/params.h as it is meant
to be defined within a protected ifdef __KERNEL conditional.
Use G_N_ELEMENTS from GLib which is the proper way of doing this.
Right now, when we create a GtkModelMenu for a GMenuModel, we listen to
changes to the menu's attach-widget to detect when a toplevel
GtkApplicationWindow becomes available to fetch actions from it.
This unfortunately breaks this simple code:
GtkWidget *application_window = gtk_application_window_new();
GtkWidget *menu_button = gtk_menu_button_new();
GMenuModel *menu_model = get_menu_model();
gtk_menu_button_set_menu_model(menu_button, menu_model);
gtk_container_add(GTK_CONTAINER(application_window), menu_button);
Since GtkMenuButton creates a GtkModelMenu and sets itself as its attach
widget before it's added to a hierarchy containing a
GtkApplicationWindow.
Fix the bug by simply listening for changes in the window hierarchy, and
creating the menu model when the attach widget is added to an
application window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679454
When the menu is detached, the attach-widget property changes value to
NULL, so we should notify a property change, like
gtk_menu_attach_to_widget() does.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679454
The signals for the action group were being disconnected when the action
group was explicitly removed from the GActionMuxer but the same was not
being done when it was finalized.
This means that a change in the state of an action group that used to be
associated with a finalized GActionMuxer would result in a crash. This
would happen for stateful application actions after closing a window.
gdk_device_list_slave_devices only makes sense to call on master
devices, yet its g_return_if_fail check made it reject such devices.
Pointed out by monty.
When inline-selection is set, and the completion popup is showing,
pressing left abruptly jumps to the beginning of the entry text.
This is not expected, since the cursor is at the end of the text before
the left key is pressed, and this behavior is completely inconsistent
with how an entry would normally behave.
The behavior can be observed in Epiphany by selecting a completion match
and pressing left.
This patch changes the code so that it just runs the default entry key
press keybindings in such a case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677915
Mark the new_order argument as zero-terminated array, even though it does not
need to be zero terminated (it has an implicit length not given by a constant
or another method argument). It does not hurt if bindings append an extra zero
to the array as long as it has enough elements, and this makes the method
introspectable.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677941
Remove the 'you shall not connect' message from this signal.
While it is a keybinding signal, using it from applications is
fine and, in fact, expected.
There are three bugs here:
- we should check if the value type is transformable instead of being
compatible, since that's all we care about in order to call
g_value_transform()
- the check is only meaningful in the direction
passed-in-type->column-type and not viceversa
- we should init the destination GValue to the column type before
calling g_value_transform on it, or the destination type information
will be missing and the method will fail
Thanks to Jasper St. Pierre and Colin Walters for all the help in
tracking this down.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677649
There are three bugs here:
- we should check if the value type is transformable instead of being
compatible, since that's all we care about in order to call
g_value_transform()
- the check is only meaningful in the direction
passed-in-type->column-type and not viceversa
- we should init the destination GValue to the column type before
calling g_value_transform on it, or the destination type information
will be missing and the method will fail
Thanks to Jasper St. Pierre and Colin Walters for all the help in
tracking this down.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677649