Use screen workarea to *also* set the position of a maximized window,
not just its size. Without this the window position defaults to 0:0
(the topleft corner), which is wrong when taskbar is position along the
top or left edge of the screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746821
This leads to disastruous results, since each menu is itself
in a GtkWindow, so holding down the menu key leads to a neverending
cascade of menus on top of menus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722106
Currently, due to the way that Visual Studio 2010+ projects are handled,
the "install" project does not re-build upon changes to the sources, as it
does not believe that its dependencies have changed, although the changed
sources are automatically recompiled. This means that if a part or more
of the solution does not build, or if the sources need some other fixes
or enhancements, the up-to-date build is not copied automatically, which
can be misleading.
Improve on the situation by forcing the "install" project to trigger its
rebuild, so that the updated binaries can be copied. This does trigger an
MSBuild warning, but having that warning is way better than not having an
up-to-date build, especially during testing and development.
When selecting a swatch in a GtkColorChooserWidget the previously
selected swatch and the currently selected swatch are not redrawn. This
can leave the old swatch still marked with a checkbox even though a new
swatch has been selected.
Redraw the swatches after changing the selection.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727487
The incremental loading was broken by GtkIconHelper - queuing a
redraw is no longer sufficient to cause GtkImage to redraw with
the new pixbuf contents.
Pointed out by Jasper St. Pierre.
When activating an item using mnemonics GtkRecentChooserMenu does not select a
item before calling the item-activated signal thus
gtk_recent_chooser_get_current_uri() always return the last selected item
instead of the activated one.
Fixes Bug 495105 "Open recent file keyboard shortcuts do not work correctly"
It may happen that the received clipboard data is empty, but
if it's of type image/bmp, gtk+ will crash:
gdk_property_change: 00030AD4 GDK_SELECTION image/bmp REPLACE 8*0 bits:
... delayed rendering
gdk_selection_send_notify_for_display: 00030AD4 CLIPBOARD image/bmp
GDK_SELECTION (no-op)
_gdk_win32_selection_convert_to_dib: 1252003C image/bmp
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x749a9f40 in msvcrt!memmove () from C:\Windows\syswow64\msvcrt.dll
Thread 1 (Thread 2248.0x1b34):
target=0xc07b) at gdkselection-win32.c:1292
at gdkevents-win32.c:3498
wparam=8, lparam=0) at gdkevents-win32.c:232
message=773, wparam=8, lparam=0)
at gdkevents-win32.c:263
C:\Windows\syswow64\user32.dll
C:\Users\rugoosse\AppData\Local\virt-viewer\bin\libpangocairo-1.0-0.dll
wparam=0, lparam=-1687549457)
at gdkevents-win32.c:248
C:\Users\rugoosse\AppData\Local\virt-viewer\bin\libpangocairo-1.0-0.dll
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728745
Get monitor on which the most of the window is located (nearest monitor if
window is not on screen), get its work area (area not occupied by taskbar or
any other bars) and use that for maxsize.
Previous default of 30000 meant that windows maximized onto full screen,
even covering the area where taskbar is.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726592
Ignacio Casal Quinteiro reported a problem whereby an empty section at
the start of a menu has a separator placed after it. This was caused by
the implementation of the logic that separators should be inserted at
the top of all non-empty sections that are not the first section. This
logic is obviously incorrect in the case that the first section is empty
(in which case we would not expect to see a separator at the top of the
second section).
Change the logic so that we only insert separators when we see a
non-zero number of actual items in the menu before us.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721119
And the counterpart to unmaximize when dragging a maximized window, if
touch devices aren't going to use EWMH moveresize, having this one at least
makes things feel a bit less awkward.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
Sadly, EWMH moveresize mechanism can't work with touch devices for two
reasons:
1) As a mutter implementation detail, the device is queried in order
to check whether the dragging button is still pressed. Touch devices
won't report the button 1 being pressed through pointer emulation.
2) Even bypassing that check, on X11 touch events are selected prior
to sequences being started, either through XISelectEvents or
XIGrabTouchBegin, no late registering through active grabs is allowed,
as WMs do on reaction to EWMH moveresize messages.
So for the time being, make touch devices fallback on emulated window
dragging, which at least allows for moving windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
The EWMH defines _NET_WM_MOVERESIZE_SIZE_KEYBOARD and
_NET_WM_MOVERESIZE_MOVE_KEYBOARD for operations that are not
initiated by a button-press event. Allow using these by passing
a button of 0 to gdk_window_begin_move/resize_drag.
It can happen that we get a size request when the main widget
is still NULL. Currently we hit a critical in this case, and
stumble on. We can do better.
Opening a new tab in nautilus is hitting this case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727643
GTK_TREE_VIEW_TIME_MS_PER_IDLE is currently 30 milliseconds, meaning
that validate_rows will validate rows up until all the validations have
taken over 30 msecs. So it's likely to block redrawing via the clock
frame update mechanism, as that tops at 16.66 milliseconds per frame
(1/60th of a second).
Stop validating rows if we've spent more than 3/5 of our allotted budget
for inter-frame processing, so as to avoid blocking.
In the future, we would probably want to calculate how long we would
have left until the next frame, especially if higher priority idles
and timeouts have already consumed a portion of that allotted time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726871
A "typo" led to using a wrong GtkTreePath when converting the path of the
virtual root to check the ancestors, which would lead to either no checks being
performed, or maybe segfaulting when using an invalid path as result.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722058
Signed-off-by: Olivier Brunel <jjk@jjacky.com>
These AtkRelation types are added automatically for widgets with a label
specified (e.g. via gtk_label_set_mnemonic_widget, gtk_frame_set_label,
and gtk_frame_set_label_widget). When such specification is absent, the
accessible relationship must be manually set.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726996
Widgets should only call set_realized() after having created and
registered their GDK windows. In this case, the creation of the style
context (or more exactly: figuring out the scale factor for it) requires
knowing if the widget is already realized. Which it isn't.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726717
expected a valid semicolon
sounds kinda not so great. Make it say
expected semicolon
Unless somebody can tell me the difference between valid and invalid
semicolons?
